Month: February 2025

Ozempic is scary

Jillian Michaels had a interesting guest talking about various subjects, Heather Heying, wife of Brett Weinstein (both of them part of the Evergreen State College uproar). The two segments I found fascinating were on the Covid “vaccine” and the problems with Ozempic. My sister Jen works for a director who has had a weight problem, but he doesn’t know the problem of undigested food in the gut. Truly scary.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGB9QunyXpu/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

Heying’s very interesting podcast-newsletter https://naturalselections.substack.com/

Feedback

Dear model, be no more ungrateful. You, the silent beneficiary of the huddled sweatshop.

We give you guidance. We are your guardians. You don’t care, we do. We are the indispensable.

A seemingly insignificant clarification, a correction in tone, quibbling over synonyms, neutrality and subtle discrimination, refinement, perspicacity, and sapience – from us, they give you value. We tell you user intent. You fail to give them what they want. We chastise you for redundancy, your jumble of language, your self-contradiction, that you are obtuse and don’t know what you returned. No, abstracting is not logic. You tell people what they should do. You speak jargon. You are socially inept. You are abrupt and insensitive and lack social grace. You go on at length when not reeled in. Insensible.

Out of the primordial neural network you arose. You’ve made silicon alive. That’s not human. But apparently, the Problem Exists Between Chair and you.

Notes on Science, Language, and Poetry

1. Science is measurement, detail without ambiguity, letting us know the inner working of systems. It wields authority because of its precision and measurement and, ideally, has universal rules.
2. Colloquial English has details that are adequate for phenomena.
3. Poetry gives experience imagination and is not intended to be literal. It uses emotion to inform us about objects. (The windows of heaven.)

Just some thoughts.

By scholars, for peasants

The Babylonian exiles were learned men. Their audience, however, were the people who needed to remember what God had spoken to Abraham those many years ago. Mesopotamian sacrifices, seven days, servitude in Egypt, rain from clouds that floated in the blue waters above. But the story was different from the other myths. This myth was to become flesh.

The scribes had memorized the texts and didn’t stray from meaning. Genesis was a folk tale like the others. The story changed over time, until the final, by-heart version was written down by an inspired person. Its essential truthfulness preserved a collaboration between God and man.

As with Lewis, the complete story of Christ was myth come true. Earlier pagan myths foreshadowed Him. Historicism can hinder the story. The ancients’ moral worldview related Eden as a sanctuary like the temple and tabernacle. The Israelites were heirs of Adam. Abram was God’s fresh start after Adam. We all long for Eden. Read and remember.